In March this year Tony Blair told businessmen that he wanted
to: "Raise our aspirations. I want Britain to aim for universal access to the
Internet by 2005."
He went on: "It is vital if we are not only to avoid social
divisions over the new economy but to create a knowledge economy of the future,
which is for everyone."
"We are undoubtedly doing well in the European league. But that
is no reason for complacency. We have to try harder. That's why I've set the
goal of Britain being the best place for e-commerce by 2002."
The ideal of an internet for the people and a free transfer of
information and ideas is one few of us would not aspire to. But in reality, by
2005 there may be but a handful of providers who give a global nation access to
an electronic world.
The stance of "no complacency" must be taken up now by those
with the regulatory authority to guarantee competitiveness and plurality. The
electronic, knowledge-based economy is open to exploitation in these early days
and our submission to the departments of Culture Media and Sport and Trade and
Industry holds this as a pressing concern.
Trinity Mirror is the largest publisher in the UK and the second
largest in Europe. Our spread of interest stretches from national newspapers to
regional titles, from trade magazines to exhibitions, from on-line publications
to a national ISP. The communications world as we know it is developing and
changing by the day. We are therefore delighted that the departments of Culture
Media and Sport and Trade and Industry have invited comments from stakeholders
on the reforms needed to ensure British companies like ours can take an active
part.
Cross-media ownership
Economies of scale in telephony and explosive change in the
electronic means of communication have significantly lowered barriers of entry
to our industry. While the government should do everything in its power to
encourage expansion and growth it must also accept a challenge to the dichotomy
that exists between the state of modern communications and the laws that
determine cross media ownership. Newspapers are just one of many mediums that a
mass population chooses to obtain its information from. The gradual shrinkage in
our industry indicates that our established consumer base is turning to a vast
array of alternative means. At the same time, the emergence of huge media
organisations undefined Time Warner/AOL and more recently the Vivendi merger
with Canal Plus and Seagram undefined indicates a convergence at a global
level.
The slight relaxation in media ownership regulations brought
about by the Broadcasting Acts of 1990 and 1996 was a helpful move in the right
direction. However, we believe the time has come for the removal of all
"cross-media" restrictions. British companies must be able to hold their
position in an ever-converging market. To do this, they must be able to increase
in scale and that will only be possible through consolidation.
Trinity Mirror believes the "20 per cent" rule limiting,
inter-alia, ownership of terrestrial television licences by national newspapers;
radio stations by national newspapers and local radio stations by local
newspapers should be revoked.
Cross-media mergers should simply be subject to normal
competition and merger rules with no media specific legislation.
Newspaper mergers
In 1973 LBC became the first radio station to challenge the
BBCundefineds 50-year radio monopoly. The Fair Trading Act was also enshrined in
the statute books that year. Whereas the electronic communications industry is
almost unrecognisable 27 years on, those same laws continue to govern newspaper
mergers today.
Despite aiming to protect consumers from a concentration of
ownership and a reduction in plurality, this 1973 Act could become detrimental
to local newspaper groups at the very time when newspapers are facing threats to
their viability from competing advertising routes to market. The legal context
in which newspapers can or cannot consolidate leads to a distortion of the
market. The timetable imposed as a natural consequence of mandatory references
to the Competition Commission of simple newspaper mergers gives an unfair
advantage in contested bids to non-newspaper owning parties. If newspaper groups
are not allowed to consolidate they will be put at an irreversible competitive
disadvantage. As foreign companies assimilate national heritage titles in their
own quest for consolidation, local newspaper groups must be allowed to operate
within a more stimulating environment.
Legislation enacted to protect plurality is in danger of
becoming detrimental to its longevity.
Trinity Mirror argues that newspaper transfer provisions in the
1973 Fair Trading Act should be revoked and that normal merger rules should
apply to newspaper consolidation.
Regulation
Co-regulation and self-regulation are the most efficient
mechanisms for promoting business best practice. Trinity Mirror has a positive
belief in self-regulation of newspapers in the form of a body such as the Press
Complaints Commission and believes that other regulatory authorities should
adopt a close co-operative role where there is a potential crossover with
technology or content.
Regulation of the internet and e-commerce is a concern and
self-regulation of content should be adopted wherever possible, for example
on-line publishing and information held on a portal. The internet should
continue to be subject to general laws including those of defamation, copyright
and obscenity. Service providers who become aware that they are storing
infringing material should have a responsibility to remove that material or
disable access to it. However they should not be liable for information
transmitted along a communications network.
The initial findings of the OFTEL/OFT study into competition
barriers to e-commerce are that competition issues in new market places are not
likely to differ fundamentally from issues that regulatory authorities are
already facing. They do, however, give consideration to the speed of regulation
in such a fast-moving market place and the possibility of premature regulation
stifling growth.
Supra-national businesses will try to avoid being restricted by
country specific legislation. Threats to inward investment as a result of
ill-judged regulation must also be a consideration for the two
departments.
E-commerce and electronic communications
The Royal Commission on the press, 1947-1949 concluded that free
enterprise was a pre-requisite of a free press. In the same way today, it would
seem that free enterprise has so far acted as a pre-cursor to freedom in the
provision of electronic communication. Open standards have enabled the
development of a large number of content and e-commerce providers. However,
anti-competitive behaviour at this early stage will prevent the market from
developing and severely restrict plurality.
Moves by cable operators to limit internet access to walled
gardens and prohibitive tendencies of determining which portal a user can or
cannot have as his or her homepage are issues which must be considered
immediately. When mass online communication becomes a reality, it may be too
late to confront issues of access left unchecked now. The joint OFT and OFTEL
report into competition in e-commerce repeatedly states that dominant players
may emerge in these new markets and competition issues may arise.
Trinity Mirror argues that competition regulators should have
the powers to maintain and openly enforce an open platform for service
providers. Telecommunications companies and cable providers must not be able to
create a bias for themselves and lock out any fledgling ISPs or portal
providers. All internet users should have access to the whole of the World Wide
Web and not be limited by the commercial interests of their local host.
The competition authorities should protect consumer choice from
limitations imposed by those with proprietorial interests in technology in areas
such as the default condition for WAP phones and listings on Electronic
Programme Guides.
There should be no conflict between the frustrations felt over
archaic laws governing modern newspaper ownership and consolidation and the
pressing need to create the right environment for new and emerging
e-commerce.
Both the DTI and the DCMS will be familiar with the newspaper
industry's dissatisfaction with the current economic regulations that restrict
our business. This remains the case and we would like the playing field leveled
out.
We do, however, welcome attempts made by both departments to
tackle the embryonic market place being created by the converging IT,
communications and telecommunications industries. Emerging global services will
shape the world we live and work in. Trinity Mirror's key interests include old
and new media. They should both be given the best possible chance to succeed in
a fiercely competitive age.
* Trinity Mirror believes the "20 per cent" rule limiting,
inter-alia, ownership of terrestrial television licences by national newspapers;
radio stations by national newspapers and local radio stations by local
newspapers should be revoked. Cross-media mergers should simply be subject to
normal competition and merger rules with no media specific legislation.
* Trinity Mirror argues that newspaper transfer provisions in
the 1973 Fair Trading Act should be revoked and that normal merger rules should
apply to newspaper consolidation.
* Trinity Mirror has a positive belief in self-regulation of
newspapers in the form of a body such as the Press Complaints Commission and
believes that other regulatory authorities should adopt a close co-operative
role where there is a potential crossover with technology or content.
* Trinity Mirror argues that competition regulators should have
the powers to maintain and openly enforce an open platform for service
providers. Telecommunications companies and cable providers must not be able to
create a bias for themselves and lock out any fledgling ISPs or portal
providers. All internet users should have access to the whole of the World Wide
Web and not be limited by the commercial interests of their local host.
* The competition authorities should protect consumer choice
from limitations imposed by those with proprietorial interests in technology in
areas such as the default condition for WAP phones and listings on Electronic
Programme Guides.